No ‘Fore’ as Golf Club Hacks Maples

Hey Class,

The second article I’ve chosen for my blog entry discussed the effects of the removal of four mature trees from the bordering lawn of a golf course and local residence. Because it was believed that many golf balls were being struck towards the bordering homes of local residence, four huge trees have been removed and replaced with a tower more than 24 metres high, with hefty steel posts supporting black mesh screens!
Local residence question, “How can we feel the same friendliness and trust we’ve always had?” Also, they have noted that, “The relationship with the golf course has changed forever. And the landscape, once green and open will be forever scarred.” I believe this article can be related to Debord’s idea of derive. Similar to Debord’s beliefs, the residences of the area view the trees as a contributing factor to their understanding of the space around them. In their opinion, the trees helped create an enjoyable, open atmosphere that brought ease and relaxation to the scene. With the trees gone and an massive fence blocking their view, residence likely now feel as though their freedom has been take away and may also feel a sense of seclusion and disassociation with the golf course and rest of the community. Although I understand and truly feel for the residence of the area, as their lives have likely been changed forever, I also understand the golf courses lack of alternatives and true need for action.